Bridging current knowledge gaps to enable the UPTAKE of carbon dioxide removal methods

Climate, Energy & MobilityHORIZON-RIAID: 101081521
EC Contribution
€62,895
Consortium Size
21 orgs
Start Year
2023
Summary

UPTAKE aims to facilitate the sustainable upscaling of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) methods by developing a set of robust strategies through technical, theoretical, and practical analysis accompanied by interactive dialogue within a CDR stakeholder forum. As a result, UPTAKE will develop a harmonised, comprehensive, inclusive, integrated, and transparent CDR knowledge inventory to evaluate a wide range of CDR technologies and methods, quantifying their national, European, and global costs, effectiveness, and removal potential as well as risks, constraints, and side-effects at different scales, and their prospects of technological progress. The UPTAKE approach will allow the assessment of geographical, sectoral, socioeconomic, demographic, and temporal trade-offs, co-benefits, and opportunities emerging from portfolios of different CDR methods. The enhanced socio-technical understanding of CDR methods will feed into an ensemble of state-of-the-art integrated assessment models (IAMs), which will help improve the integration of CDR methods given the EU policy objectives set for 2030, 2050, and beyond climate neutrality. UPTAKE will assess CDR governance and policy frameworks considering social acceptance, accountability, monitoring, and regulations for sustainable CDR rollout at scale. As a result, UPTAKE will generate an open and interactive CDR roadmap explorer to investigate strategies that are resilient to risks of failure and disruption, and minimise adverse impacts on society, economy, and the environment, aiming for a just, inclusive, and sustainable transition.

Consortium (21)

Project Results (21)

Source: CORDIS, the EU research results database.

Publications (17)
Between inflated expectations and inherent distrust: How publics see the role of experts in governing climate intervention technologies
Environmental Science & Policy· 2025DOI
Livia Fritz; Lucilla Losi; Chad M. Baum; Sean Low; Benjamin K. Sovacool
Biomass exclusion must be weighed against benefits of carbon supply in European energy system
Nature Energy· 2025DOI
M. Millinger; F. Hedenus; E. Zeyen; F. Neumann; L. Reichenberg; G. Berndes
Diversity of biomass usage pathways to achieve emissions targets in the European energy system
Nature Energy· 2025DOI
M. Millinger; F. Hedenus; E. Zeyen; F. Neumann; L. Reichenberg; G. Berndes
National climate strategies show inequalities in global development of carbon dioxide geological storage
Communications Earth & Environment· 2025DOI
Juan Alcalde; Gareth Johnson; Jennifer J. Roberts
A taxonomy to map evidence on the co-benefits, challenges, and limits of carbon dioxide removal
Communications Earth & Environment· 2024DOI
Ruben Prütz; Sabine Fuss; Sarah Lück; Leon Stephan; Joeri Rogelj
Assessing the Sustainability of Miscanthus and Willow as Global Bioenergy Crops: Current and Future Climate Conditions (Part 1)
Agronomy· 2024DOI
Mohamed Abdalla, Astley Hastings, Grant Campbell, Heyu Chen, Pete Smith
Climate beliefs, climate technologies and transformation pathways: Contextualizing public perceptions in 22 countries
Global Environmental Change· 2024DOI
Livia Fritz, Chad M. Baum, Elina Brutschin, Sean Low, Benjamin K. Sovacool
Durability of carbon dioxide removal is critical for Paris climate goals
Communications Earth & Environment· 2024DOI
Brunner, Cyril; Hausfather, Zeke; Knutti, Reto
Imputation of missing IPCC AR6 data on land carbon sequestration
Earth System Science Data· 2024DOI
Ruben Prütz; Sabine Fuss; Joeri Rogelj
International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control· 2024DOI
Johanna Beiron; Filip Johnsson
Potential and goal conflicts in reverse auction design for bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS)
Environmental Sciences Europe· 2024DOI
Fridahl, Mathias; Möllersten, Kenneth; Lundberg, Liv; Rickels, Wilfried
Public engagement for inclusive and sustainable governance of climate interventions
Nature Communications· 2024DOI
Livia Fritz, Chad M. Baum, Sean Low, Benjamin K. Sovacool
The public use of early-stage scientific advances in carbon dioxide removal: a science-technology-policy-media perspective
Environmental Research Letters· 2024DOI
Giorgio Tripodi, Fabrizio Lillo, Roberto Mavilia, Andrea Mina, Francesca Chiaromonte, Francesco Lamperti
Energy demand and savings opportunities in the supply of limestone and olivine-rich rocks for geochemical carbon dioxide removal
Environmental Research LettersDOI
Serena De Marco, Stefano Caserini, Thorben Amann and Mario Grosso
Environmental Research Letters
Environmental Research LettersDOI
Josh Burke, Felix Schenuit
Environmental Research Letters
Environmental Research LettersDOI
Murugan Ramasamy, Thorben Amann and Nils Moosdorf
Environmental Research Letters
Environmental Research LettersDOI
Setu Pelz, Gaurav Ganti, Shonali Pachauri, Joeri Rogelj, Keywan Riahi
Deliverables (3)
Documents, reports
Documents, reports
Websites, patent fillings, videos etc.
Other Results (1)
Periodic Reporting for period 1 - UPTAKE (Bridging current knowledge gaps to enable the UPTAKE of carbon dioxide removal methods)