Democracy, Autocracy, and International Cooperation

HORIZON.1.1HORIZON-ERCID: 101097437
EC Contribution
€24,999
Consortium Size
1 orgs
Start Year
2024
Summary

One of the most consistent findings in the study of world politics is the positive relationship between democratic regimes and international cooperation. Yet events in recent years suggest a more complicated picture. Several democracies have withered in their support for international organizations, while autocracies simultaneously have stepped up their commitments to cooperation. This project will use recent developments as a backdrop for launching a new research agenda on the relationship between regime type and international cooperation. Guided by the over-arching question of why, how, and under what conditions regime type affects international cooperation, this project will conduct the most systematic and comprehensive analysis so far of this relationship. Theoretically, it will break new ground by developing a novel framework for identifying how regime type may have varying and conditional effects on international cooperation. Empirically, it will be more comprehensive than any previous research effort, examining this relationship over a longer time period and across a broader range of international cooperation, based on an extensive new data collection. Methodologically, it will leverage an ambitious multi-method design, combining large-N statistical analysis, experimental analysis, and in-depth case analysis in a complementary fashion and with a comparative orientation. In addition, the project will be policy relevant by generating insights on the resilience (or not) of international cooperation in an age of democratic decline.

Consortium (1)

Project Results (10)

Source: CORDIS, the EU research results database.

Publications (9)
Public opinion and international organizations
The Review of International Organizations· 2026DOI
Lisa Dellmuth, Jonas Tallberg
Blame Shifting in Autocracies following Large-Scale Disasters: Evidence from Turkey
Perspectives on Politics· 2025DOI
Edward Goldring, Jonas Willibald Schmid, Fulya Apaydin
Constrainers vs Enablers? : Fiscal Deficits and the Political Survival of Finance Ministers Across Regime Types
Political Studies· 2025DOI
Jonas Willibald Schmid, Lasse Aaskoven
Debating Threats in the UNSC: A New Dataset on Explanations of Votes 1989–2019
International Studies Perspectives· 2025DOI
Karin Sundström, Magnus Lundgren, Mark Klamberg
Democracy, Autocracy, and the Design of International Organizations
International Studies Quarterly· 2025DOI
Jonas Tallberg, Carl Vikberg
Effects of Popular Legitimacy on International Organizations: An Elite Survey Experiment
The Journal of Politics· 2025DOI
Thomas Sommerer, Jonas Tallberg
Electoral autocracies, hybrid regimes, and multiparty autocracies: same, same but different?
Democratization· 2025DOI
Jonas Willibald Schmid
Peer opinion and the legitimacy of international organizations
The Review of International Organizations· 2025DOI
Matthias Ecker-Ehrhardt, Lisa Dellmuth, Jonas Tallberg
Ideology and Legitimacy in Global Governance
International Organization· 2024DOI
Matthias Ecker-Ehrhardt, Lisa Dellmuth, Jonas Tallberg
Deliverables (1)
Data Management Plan